Monday, November 9, 2009, 12:39 AM CST
[
General]
by Ian Punnett
In the basements and research labs of universities all over the country, government-funded “mad” scientists are experimenting with our future.
I use “mad” in the same way that mainstream academia would have used it a hundred years ago--scientists that are doing work against the will or nature of God.
A loose definition, perhaps, but a handy one for critics who thought there were many things that we take for granted today that just should be done, for example, surgeries where doctors “play God” by undoing genetic mutations or other “acts of God” that will change our “fate”:
For example:
(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at Purdue University have discovered a new approach for repairing damaged nerve fibers in spinal cord injuries using nano-spheres that could be injected into the blood shortly after an accident.
The synthetic "copolymer micelles" are drug-delivery spheres about 60 nanometers in diameter, or roughly 100 times smaller than the diameter of a red blood cell.
Purdue researchers have now shown that the micelles themselves repair damaged axons, fibers that transmit electrical impulses in the spinal cord.
"That was a very surprising discovery," said Ji-Xin Cheng, an associate professor in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Chemistry. "Micelles have been used for 30 years as drug-delivery vehicles in research, but no one has ever used them directly as a medicine."
Today, we still have our “science can but does that mean science should” debates and medical ethics should never just “green light” everything. But as the good work of DARPA funded researchers progresses, we are wise to judge the work done by “fringe” scientists not by how something sounds to us at first but how it changes the lives of the people it benefits.
And we would be wise to avoid the same kind of “torch rally response” against mosques or Islamic centers across the country as a result of the shootings at Fort Hood, TX last Thursday but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be concerned.
Saturday night I interviewed the co-author of “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America” and we talked about where Maj. Nidal Hasan worshiped and whether or not it was part of this terrorist underground. Today, as if on cue, this piece appears on the The Daily Beast:
The alleged Fort Hood gunman had revealed a hard-line Islamist streak to acquaintances in the Muslim Community Center that he made his mosque. The Daily Beast's Asra Q. Nomani reports.
Not long ago, inside the quiet library of the Muslim Community Center here in Silver Spring, Maryland, a suburb of Washington, D.C., Golam Akhter, a local Bangladeshi-American civil engineer, 67, got into a fierce debate with a young Muslim doctor over how to interpret the concept of “jihad” within Islam. Akhter argued, “Jihad means an inner struggle, fighting against corruption and injustice.”
The young doctor responded. “That’s not a correct interpretation. Jihad means holy war. When your religion isn’t safe, you have to fight for it. If someone attacks you, you must fight them. That is jihad. You can kill someone who is harming you.”
The conversation would be just another theological debate, interesting but irrelevant, except that the doctor was Maj. Nidal Hasan, 39, the gunman in the tragic Fort Hood rampage. After being posted to Walter Reed Hospital as a psychiatrist, Hasan called the Muslim Community Center his local mosque. It’s just a short drive away from Walter Reed.
So who else was worshiping there and what are they responsible for? Coincidence? Here’s the rest of the piece:
www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/...
Let’s keep our caps on but the blinders off.