Hey Ian

It is my suspicion that Coast to Coast is CIA laced.
I mean there are some great subject on the show but then shadow people and ghost cars.
I think its to confuse issues.
Hey man You grew up near the Baha`i temple in Wilmette.
Why not have a show on BahuLLah who claims to be the return of Christ and or do a show about the Bahai Faith.???????
Strange that george Norrey or you dont talk about it.
Bahaullahs claim by the Bahais is stupendous and qiute frankly turns off most agnostics.

...The "channeling of MJ" was a tad played out, but otherwise a great show tonight. Thank Ian...

Hi Ian,

Love the Georges and Art, but you have become my fav c2c host. You actually ask questions and follow-up questions of the guests. If what we are all after more knowledge of these esoteric and long-repressed subjects we do have to research them seriously. And you are very funny.

The reason for my post today is to compliment you on the Michael Jackson show. Like you I am/was a fan to a point. I'm Af Am and close to Michael's age, so I hold in my heart the image of that beautiful little boy singing his heart out and the very handsome and elegant young man of the Off the Wall era. I was confused and alienated by the facial disfigurement and child molestation era. Reading David Ike's take on celebrity, as out there as it is, gave me the most plausible explanation for why these very famous and talented people lead such perplexing lives. I also gained insight from you and your guests today. The show presented a more complex read of the surgeries--perhaps less racial self-hatred and more related to his ambivalent relationship with his father. --Maybe I'm going soft, but even the channeling seemed on point. Good work! Lots of peace and love to you and your family--Pam

Love your show when I get a chance to listen. You might find this an interesting topic and perhaps a guest for a show.

www.caesarsmessiah.com/summary.html

Your in depth style of questioning is great!

This is a commentary about the SETI pulses and the question of possible alien communication. When aliens have been channeled in the past and asked why "they" don't respond to our attempts to make contact via the SETI project and other means, the response is always the same. They say that the first time they made radio contact, the scientists behind the project concluded that the signal being received was some sort of anomaly. "They" have also said they will attempt another radio communication again, but they predict the same thing will happen. Could this recent pulse detected by SETI be this attempt?

The first time I read anything credible about aliens attempting communication was in a series of books by Dolores Cannon, who uses deep hypnosis and regression techniques and sometimes these sessions result in some pretty extraordinary information coming through. In her Convoluted Universe books, a counsel of nine unique beings are channeled who describe themselves as having different areas of expertise. They communicate via the subject who is in a deep trance or somnambulist state, the deepest level of hypnosis. The technique takes years of practice to master and very few individuals are able to reach such a deep state. Cannon has been publishing verbatim transcripts from these sessions since the late 1980s beginning with her popular Nostradamus books.

Cannon isn't the only author however, but she may have been the first to go public with her findings. For example, in "They Walked with Jesus" and "Jesus and the Essenes," it is revealed that Jesus studied for years at a compound not far from Jerusalem from the age of 5 and then furthered his spiritual education and honed his oratorical skills by studying with masters in Europe and Asia, travelling on foot with his entire family-- minus Joseph. Sylvia Browne writes about this 15 years later, except only as an assumption based on premonitions and discussions with her spirit guide. She understands the woman called Mary is not his mother unfortunately and assumes it is Mary Magdalene, and because of her persuasive style and credibility at the time, combined with similar assumptions from other authors who have read about a European traveler about 2,000 years ago who fits the description of Jesus, this has become the alternate theory that is most accepted by Gnostics and other students of alternative religions.

On another subject which I've commented on before, I recently did some research on the golden record that was sent out into space via Voyager over two decades ago, and it didn't take me too long to connect the relationship between the crop circle phenomenon and the images which were on the disk. Some were exact copycats while other more recent images suggest a direct response to data that is on this disk, including a ratchet pi design and another one which shows understanding of binary numbers and code. Again, instead of embracing this as being a signal from alien life that they are out there and hear us loud and clear, the "experts" determine that the circles are an elaborate hoax.

Even the statement recorded by President Carter on the disk seems to indicate prior knowledge of alien life. Instead of "Hi, it's President Carter here, if you're out there, we're here on Earth, 3rd rock from the sun. Glad you were able to intercept this record, and we hope that our paths might cross in the future- Peace Out, Jimmy," he makes a very forward and assuming statement lamenting the global challenges we are facing here on Earth which is keeping us from joining their galactic community presently and that down the road we hope we can resolve our problems so we can join up with the group.

While I'm paraphrasing what is actually said by Carter, I think it's pretty obvious that the statement has a deeper meaning to those who are ready to think about the big picture. Whenever something seems out of place or not customary, that usually is a signal that there's more to the story, and I think President Carter's recorded statement is deliberately vague enough for us, yet readily understood by them.

This reminds me of the story about the man who is drowning, which I will sum up for the benefit of those who may not have heard it. The man decides to stay behind when his village floods, praying to and believing that God will save him. Soon a boat comes down the river and he won't get on it, saying "God will save me" and later a helicopter comes as the river rises, and he says "No God will save me" and he shoos them away. He eventually drowns and when he meets God, he asks "God, why didn't you save me?" and God responds "Son, I sent you a boat and a helicopter, what more did you want?"

Apart from some pretty drastic measures, what else can these aliens do to prove their existence? They have done everything reasonable without scaring the wits completely out of us. They also continue to show their existence in progressively bolder ways every year but it is up to the individual to decide whether or not they wish to, or are psychologically prepared to acknowledge their existence. If you believe in free will, then you understand that, like God, Jesus, Angelic beings and celestial spirits, they are concepts that not everybody wishes to embrace, so if they were to force themselves on us they would be interfering with what could be called the universal code of conduct, so to speak.

I'm very comfortable with their approach, and I think it's just measured enough to pique the interest of those who are ready to accept their existence without freaking out an entire group of people who aren't yet ready to embrace this truth. Besides, any race which is advanced enough to visit Earth from a remote star system understands and probably operates under free will themselves, so if it isn't a universal law, it's certainly a concept they understand and respect.

Coming back to SETI, it seems that the real problem here and with all the other experiments which seek to prove the existence of alien life in any form is that when the data comes back with positive evidence, nobody at the organization wants to believe it. And if THEY aren't able to believe it, how are WE able to find the information credible, especially when it's presented chopped up, rearranged, dissected and regurgitated for the benefit of mass consumption?

Just like the skeptics who say that we never landed on the moon, or that the holocaust never happened, if you're persuasive enough, you can get a lot of people to DISbelieve just about anything.