Login:
Password:
Not a member? Signup!
Content Conversation
April 05 ,2009 01:04AM
Posted by Ian Punnett
Post Content

by Ian Punnett

 

 

By now, everybody has heard the sad news about another group of dead police officers:

A man opened fire on officers during a domestic disturbance call Saturday morning, killing three of them, a police official said. 

Friends said 23 year-old Richard Poplawski feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns. 

Three officers were killed.

Poplawski was arrested after a several-hour standoff. 

One witness reported hearing hundreds of shots. 

The shootings occurred just two weeks after four police officers were fatally shot March 21 in Oakland, Calif., in the deadliest day for U.S. law enforcement since Sept. 11, 2001. 

Poplawski's friends at the scene described him as a young man who thought the Obama administration would ban guns. 

A 22-year-old man who said he was Poplawski's best friend, said he got a call at work from him in which he said, "Eddie, I am going to die today. ... Tell your family I love them and I love you." 

Poplawski once had an Internet talk show but that it wasn't successful. 

Another friend, Joe DiMarco, said Poplawski had been laid off from his job at a glass factory earlier this year.   (KDKA/AP)

Killing cops because he thought Obama was going to take away his guns just doesn’t make any sense and I strongly encourage people not to buy it.  There are some on line who are already making this guy out to be some sort of sympathetic but misdirected hero, taking a stand for the Second Amendment.  Of course, killing cops who have answered a 911 call that you‘re beating your girlfriend again has as much to do with standing up for the Second Amendment as a man killing his five children has to do with showing the world what a caring father he is.

Those poor police officers and their families,  Even though they died heroes, it cannot take away from the pain of their sacrifice, especially since this shooting, like domestic battery call that started the tragic events, probably has more to do with the fragile male ego of this disturbed 22-year-old man that lives with his mother and grandmother and his gun collection that couldn’t stand losing his job.  

His defense attorneys may try and portray this guy as a victim of some perceived presidential attack on the Second Amendment but the bottom line is, if this gutless man man was still collecting a paycheck and had a hit internet radio show, these cops would be alive today.

It would seem to be the same thing for the victims of the shooting in Binghampton, NY.:

Associated Press Writer

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. (AP) - Jiverly Wong was upset over losing his job at a vacuum plant, didn't like people picking on him for his limited English and once angrily told a co-worker, "America sucks."

It remains unclear exactly why the Vietnamese immigrant strapped on a bulletproof vest, barged in on a citizenship class and killed 13 people and himself, but the police chief says he knows one thing for sure: "He must have been a coward."

Jiverly Wong had apparently been preparing for a gun battle with police but changed course and decided to turn the gun on himself when he heard sirens approaching, Chief Joseph Zikuski said Saturday.

Police and Wong's acquaintances portrayed him as an angry, troubled 41-year-old man who struggled with drugs and job loss and perhaps blamed his adopted country for his troubles. His rampage "was not a surprise" to those who knew him, Zikuski said.

"He felt degraded because people were apparently making fun of his poor English speaking," the chief said.

So, here you have a portrait of two people who supposedly kill out of anger to a country but who really just couldn’t handle losing a job or being picked on and their only response is violence to the innocent.

And in the case of Poplawski, of course, not only is his killing people who had no connection to his miseries, ironically, he’s helping to kill the case that there shouldn’t be any gun control.

 

Views: 197
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Discussion (10)
By Evelyn 8 months ago   ::   Apr 12, 2009 - 01:14PM

Politics are great which can be said both seriously and sarcastically simultaneously, and with or without them I am going to enjoy my Cinnamon Toasters.


Haha!  A much more elegant way of saying what I was trying to say.

By Evelyn 8 months ago   ::   Apr 12, 2009 - 01:10PM

Evelyn and Justin,

I don't even care anymore whether a particular media outlet agrees with me on my politics.  Right, left, middle--it doesn't matter.  All I know is that the only people right now literally advocating violent uprising and what could be interpreted as seditious acts call themselves "conservatives". 

Seeing as the last guy who I could genuinely respect as a moderate conservative was probably Gerald Ford, they are a far cry from anything respectable I understand as a mainstream American.  My fear is that we have become such a segregated society that people refuse to bring facts and reason into any discourse on these shows anymore, instead choosing to self-select those tv and radio shows that say exactly what they want to hear, true or not.  All these political media "entertainers"--and several like Hannity and Limbaugh and Colter have admitted that they are basically just a-moral entertainers, looking to make a buck the easiest way they know how-


I can't disagree.  I only despair when I consider what sources offer "the truth." 

There is another aspect to this - and some have suggested it is part of a conspiracy of sorts.

Instead of Bread & Circuses we have a world where there is too much to do.  Time is too tightly scheduled, and - in one way or another - most of us spend too much time striving to keep up a standard of living we've been convinced is "normal" and desirable. Some of us are lucky enough to have vocations and avocations we love (and I am grateful to count myself among them) but still - as a middle aged woman who returned to college when my son was first enrolled, and am now a working grad student, I simply don't have the time or mental energy to track down multiple sources about every issue that concerns me.  When I can take a break from mental effort I want to spend that time with family and friends, or walking in the woods with my dog.

There may be something morally weak about that, but life can be overwhelming and I've reluctantly accepted that I have to make my choices and live with the results.

By Tim O'Tay 8 months ago   ::   Apr 10, 2009 - 08:52AM

Apr 9, 2009 -- 11:13PM, Ella wrote:

Evelyn and Justin, I don't even care anymore whether a particular media outlet agrees with me on my politics. Right, left, middle--it doesn't matter. All I know is that the only people right now literally advocating violent uprising and what could be interpreted as seditious acts call themselves "conservatives". Seeing as the last guy who I could genuinely respect as a moderate conservative was probably Gerald Ford, they are a far cry from anything respectable I understand as a mainstream American. My fear is that we have become such a segregated society that people refuse to bring facts and reason into any discourse on these shows anymore, instead choosing to self-select those tv and radio shows that say exactly what they want to hear, true or not. All these political media "entertainers"--and several like Hannity and Limbaugh and Colter have admitted that they are basically just a-moral entertainers, looking to make a buck the easiest way they know how--are catering to the basest levels of fear and hatred that the human animal is capable of, and they are determined to cash in on it while they can. Instead of trying to sow seeds of good, justice, love and compassion, they are trying to sow seeds of evil, panic, and anger and I believe that what they sow, they will reap. No decent person should be a conspirator in propagating lies, ignorance and violence simply because it gets them an audience or sponsors or good ratings, or they are just as responsible for the devastation that becomes of it.



Media organisations will always try to sway people to their way of thinking.


Of course if they're fairly influential people will agree, and if they don't make their own investigations or do further reading they're more likely to agree with someone who has the same / similar point of view.

By Tim O'Tay 8 months ago   ::   Apr 10, 2009 - 08:49AM

For comedy value I do like to watch Lou Dobbs in the evening just before dinner.


Especially a couple of weeks ago when Dobbs was reporting on a couple of shooting sprees and then followed it up with how the Obama administration is trying to impose tighter restrictions on guns.


Hmmm I wonder why that needs to be done.


 

By Justin 8 months ago   ::   Apr 10, 2009 - 07:44AM

Politics are great which can be said both seriously and sarcastically simultaneously, and with or without them I am going to enjoy my Cinnamon Toasters.

Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next

Hot Topics

    IP:
    Haha! A much more elegant way of saying what I was trying to say.
    9 Replies
    to this (blog post)
    I smell a PUBLICITY STUNT for ratings & to drum up chatter Ladies... Come on - I honestly don't believe it for a moment. Most people, if they...
    8 Replies
    to this (photo)
    I'd give him credit on one thing that all the songs on the album don't sound the same as the previous track. Something that a lot of artists tend...
    8 Replies
    to this (blog post)
    ZenZ! awesome list. i especially like the bill of rights, these days.
    5 Replies
    to this (blog post)
    Vinegar rocks!!!!!!!!
    3 Replies
    to this (blog post)